<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>trademark</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/tag/trademark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com</link>
	<description>The Business Bankruptcy Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2026 04:27:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>ABI&#8217;s Industry Viewpoint Interview: Intellectual Property And Bankruptcy</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2022/07/articles/abis-industry-viewpoint-interview-intellectual-property-and-bankruptcy/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 14:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executory contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/?p=3967</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I recently had the honor of talking with the American Bankruptcy Institute&#8217;s Editor-at-Large Bill Rochelle &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently had the honor of talking with the American Bankruptcy Institute’s Editor-at-Large Bill Rochelle about the intersection of intellectual property and bankruptcy, as part of ABI’s Industry Viewpoints video series. Bill and I discussed issues ranging from the U.S. Supreme Court’s Tempnology decision involving trademark licenses, to Section 365(n) of the Bankruptcy Code…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2022/07/articles/abis-industry-viewpoint-interview-intellectual-property-and-bankruptcy/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Throwing Shade At Sunbeam: Following Lubrizol And Not The Seventh Circuit, The First Circuit Leaves Another Trademark Licensee Rejected And Out Of Luck</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2018/01/articles/throwing-shade-sunbeam-following-lubrizol-not-seventh-circuit-first-circuit-leaves-another-trademark-licensee-rejected-luck/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executory contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/?p=3257</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Tempnology Trademark Saga. When it comes to decisions on bankruptcy and trademark licenses, the In &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Tempnology Trademark Saga. When it comes to decisions on bankruptcy and trademark licenses, the In re Tempnology LLC bankruptcy case is the gift that keeps on giving. Before turning to the First Circuit’s decision, let’s set the stage with a brief review of the underlying facts, a few more highlights from the Bankruptcy Court’s original decision, and the BAP’s subsequent take on these…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2018/01/articles/throwing-shade-sunbeam-following-lubrizol-not-seventh-circuit-first-circuit-leaves-another-trademark-licensee-rejected-luck/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Beam Of Sun For Trademark Licensees: Another Appellate Court Holds Rejection Does Not Terminate A Trademark Licensee&#8217;s Rights</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2016/11/articles/a-beam-of-sun-for-trademark-licensees-another-appellate-court-holds-rejection-does-not-terminate-a-trademark-licensees-rights/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2016 16:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankruptcy.cooley.com/?p=3133</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The In re Tempnology LLC bankruptcy case in New Hampshire has produced yet another important &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The In re Tempnology LLC bankruptcy case in New Hampshire has produced yet another important decision involving trademarks and Section 365(n) of the Bankruptcy Code. This time the decision is from the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the First Circuit (“BAP”). Although the BAP’s Section 365(n) discussion is interesting, even more significant is its holding on the impact of rejection of…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2016/11/articles/a-beam-of-sun-for-trademark-licensees-another-appellate-court-holds-rejection-does-not-terminate-a-trademark-licensees-rights/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Trend Of Protecting Trademark Licensees In Bankruptcy Continues: For The First Time A Court Extends Section 365(n) Protections To Trademark Licensees On Equitable Grounds</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2014/11/articles/the-trend-of-protecting-trademark-licensees-in-bankruptcy-continues-for-the-first-time-a-court-extends-section-365n-protections-to-trademark-licensees-on-equitable-grounds/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 06:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executory contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankruptcy.cooley.com/?p=2511</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If you doubted it before, you can stop now. The trend of courts finding ways &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you doubted it before, you can stop now. The trend of courts finding ways to protect trademark licensees from the harsh effects of losing their trademark license rights in bankruptcy is in full swing. The latest example comes in the Crumbs Bake Shop, Inc. Chapter 11 bankruptcy case in New Jersey. On October 31, 2014, Judge Michael B. Kaplan of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2014/11/articles/the-trend-of-protecting-trademark-licensees-in-bankruptcy-continues-for-the-first-time-a-court-extends-section-365n-protections-to-trademark-licensees-on-equitable-grounds/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Closer Look At Recent Trends At The Intersection Of Intellectual Property And Bankruptcy Law</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2014/09/articles/a-closer-look-at-recent-trends-at-the-intersection-of-intellectual-property-and-bankruptcy-law/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 14:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankruptcy.cooley.com/?p=2455</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I had the honor of being a panelist at the American Bankruptcy Institute&#8216;s 22nd Annual &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the honor of being a panelist at the American Bankruptcy Institute‘s 22nd Annual Southwest Bankruptcy Conference last Friday, speaking on current developments in business bankruptcy. My part of the discussion focused on recent intellectual property and bankruptcy law trends. Among the topics I covered were: For those who couldn’t attend the conference, you can follow the link in this…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2014/09/articles/a-closer-look-at-recent-trends-at-the-intersection-of-intellectual-property-and-bankruptcy-law/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>In A Reversal, Eighth Circuit Sitting En Banc Protects Trademark Licensee Whose Licensor Went Bankrupt</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2014/06/articles/in-a-reversal-eighth-circuit-sitting-en-banc-protects-trademark-licensee-by-finding-license-agreement-that-was-part-of-a-sale-not-executory/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executory contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankruptcy.cooley.com/?p=2163</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Image courtesy of  Kazuhisa Otsubo Trademark Licenses At Risk. I have written a number of &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Image courtesy of Kazuhisa Otsubo Trademark Licenses At Risk. I have written a number of times on the blog about the impact of bankruptcy on trademark licenses, with a special focus on the risk that trademark licensees face if their licensors file bankruptcy. Trademark licensees have no protection under Section 365(n) of the Bankruptcy Code, and legislative efforts to give that protection have…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2014/06/articles/in-a-reversal-eighth-circuit-sitting-en-banc-protects-trademark-licensee-by-finding-license-agreement-that-was-part-of-a-sale-not-executory/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent Reform Bill, And Its Revisions To Bankruptcy Code Section 365(n), Stalls In The Senate</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2014/05/articles/patent-reform-bill-and-its-revisions-to-bankruptcy-code-section-365n-stall-in-the-senate/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 17:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankruptcy.cooley.com/?p=2006</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Image courtesy of Matt H. Wade In December 2013 I wrote about the Innovation Act, &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Image courtesy of Matt H. Wade In December 2013 I wrote about the Innovation Act, H.R. 3309, a bill focused on patent infringement litigation and other patent law reforms that passed the House of Representatives on a bipartisan basis. My interest in the bill was because it would make the most sweeping changes to the treatment of intellectual property licenses in bankruptcy since the 1988…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2014/05/articles/patent-reform-bill-and-its-revisions-to-bankruptcy-code-section-365n-stall-in-the-senate/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Innovation Act, Passed By The House, Would Make Major Changes To Section 365(n)&#8217;s IP Licensee Protections</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2013/12/articles/innovation-act-passed-by-the-house-would-make-major-changes-to-section-365ns-ip-licensee-protections/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 12:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthered.wp.lexblogs.com/2013/12/innovation-act-passed-by-the-house-would-make-major-changes-to-section-365ns-ip-licensee-protections/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It isn&#8217;t law yet, but on December 5, 2013, the U.S. House of Representatives passed &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It isn’t law yet, but on December 5, 2013, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a significant patent reform bill known as the "Innovation Act." Although the focus of the legislation is on patent infringement litigation and other patent law revisions, the Innovation Act, H.R. 3309, would also make major changes to Section 365(n) of the Bankruptcy Code. Follow the link in the prior sentence for…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2013/12/articles/innovation-act-passed-by-the-house-would-make-major-changes-to-section-365ns-ip-licensee-protections/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do Trademark Licensees Have Reason For Hope? New Article Discusses Recent Decisions On Trademark Licenses And Bankruptcy</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2013/05/articles/do-trademark-licensees-have-reason-for-hope-new-article-discusses-recent-decisions-on-trademark-licenses-and-bankruptcy/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthered.wp.lexblogs.com/2013/05/do-trademark-licensees-have-reason-for-hope-new-article-discusses-recent-decisions-on-trademark-licenses-and-bankruptcy/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have written a number of times on the blog about the impact of bankruptcy &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have written a number of times on the blog about the impact of bankruptcy on trademark licenses, in particular what happens to trademark licensees whose licensors file bankruptcy. Trademark licensees face a real risk of losing their license rights in bankruptcy since they have no protection under Section 365(n) of the Bankruptcy Code. However, recent decisions, including an important decision…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2013/05/articles/do-trademark-licensees-have-reason-for-hope-new-article-discusses-recent-decisions-on-trademark-licenses-and-bankruptcy/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seventh Circuit Bankruptcy Ruling Is Big Win For Trademark Licensees</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2012/07/articles/seventh-circuit-bankruptcy-ruling-is-big-win-for-trademark-licensees/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthered.wp.lexblogs.com/2012/07/seventh-circuit-bankruptcy-ruling-is-big-win-for-trademark-licensees/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On July 9, 2012, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued its &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On July 9, 2012, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued its decision in Sunbeam Products, Inc. v. Chicago American Manufacturing, LLC, and in doing so handed a major victory to trademark licensees whose licenses are rejected in bankruptcy by trademark owners. A copy of the opinion is available through this link. However, before discussing the details of the opinion…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2012/07/articles/seventh-circuit-bankruptcy-ruling-is-big-win-for-trademark-licensees/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
