<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>relief from stay</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/tag/relief-from-stay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com</link>
	<description>The Business Bankruptcy Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 04:56:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Real Estate Workouts: Are Pre-Bankruptcy Waivers Of The Automatic Stay Enforceable?</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2008/02/articles/real-estate-workouts-are-pre-bankruptcy-waivers-of-the-automatic-stay-enforceable/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 04:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Financially Troubled Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automatic stay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relief from stay]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthered.wp.lexblogs.com/2008/02/real-estate-workouts-are-pre-bankruptcy-waivers-of-the-automatic-stay-enforceable/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This post examines a new decision from the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post examines a new decision from the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida involving the enforceability of a pre-bankruptcy waiver of the automatic stay. Let’s first set the stage by taking a look at a not so uncommon fact pattern involving a real estate project in financial trouble. The Real Estate Workout: Forbearance With A Price. The owner of a troubled real estate…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2008/02/articles/real-estate-workouts-are-pre-bankruptcy-waivers-of-the-automatic-stay-enforceable/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Second District Court Decides Whether A Trademark License Can Be Assumed In Bankruptcy</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2007/05/articles/a-second-district-court-decides-whether-a-trademark-license-can-be-assumed-in-bankruptcy/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 04:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relief from stay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthered.wp.lexblogs.com/2007/05/a-second-district-court-decides-whether-a-trademark-license-can-be-assumed-in-bankruptcy/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Once again, a district court has faced the issue of whether a non-exclusive trademark license &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, a district court has faced the issue of whether a non-exclusive trademark license can be assumed by a debtor in possession. Before the November 2005 decision in In re: N.C.P. Marketing Group, Inc., 337 B.R. 230 (D.Nev. 2005), no court had directly addressed that question. The decision in the N.C.P. Marketing case, now on appeal to the Ninth Circuit, held that trademark licenses are…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2007/05/articles/a-second-district-court-decides-whether-a-trademark-license-can-be-assumed-in-bankruptcy/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Automatic Stay Of Bankruptcy</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2006/07/articles/automatic-stay-of-bankruptcy/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 22:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automatic stay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relief from stay]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthered.wp.lexblogs.com/2006/07/automatic-stay-of-bankruptcy/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One of the most fundamental protections for companies or individuals filing for bankruptcy is the &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most fundamental protections for companies or individuals filing for bankruptcy is the automatic stay. In fact, when someone says a company has sought "bankruptcy protection" they usually are referring to the "protection" of the automatic stay. The automatic stay arises the instant a bankruptcy petition is filed. It doesn’t matter whether the petition is a voluntary one filed by the…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2006/07/articles/automatic-stay-of-bankruptcy/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
