<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>reclamation</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/tag/reclamation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com</link>
	<description>The Business Bankruptcy Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:35:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Text Of Legislation To Repeal Certain Of BAPCPA&#8217;s Business Bankruptcy Changes Affecting Retailers Now Available</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2009/04/articles/text-of-legislation-to-repeal-certain-of-bapcpas-business-bankruptcy-changes-affecting-retailers-now-available/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administrative claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAPCPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reclamation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthered.wp.lexblogs.com/2009/04/text-of-legislation-to-repeal-certain-of-bapcpas-business-bankruptcy-changes-affecting-retailers-now-available/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As reported in a post on the&#160;blog earlier this week, on April 2, 2009, Representative &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As reported in a post on the blog earlier this week, on April 2, 2009, Representative Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) introduced a bill entitled the "Business Reorganization and Job Protection Act of 2009." At that time the official text of the legislation was not available. The bill would repeal changes made by BAPCPA relating to (1) the deadline to assume or reject non-residential real property leases…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2009/04/articles/text-of-legislation-to-repeal-certain-of-bapcpas-business-bankruptcy-changes-affecting-retailers-now-available/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legislation Introduced To Repeal Certain Business Bankruptcy Changes Made By BAPCPA&#8217;s 2005 Amendments</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2009/04/articles/legislation-introduced-to-repeal-certain-business-bankruptcy-changes-made-by-bapcpas-2005-amendments/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 02:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administrative claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAPCPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reclamation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthered.wp.lexblogs.com/2009/04/legislation-introduced-to-repeal-certain-business-bankruptcy-changes-made-by-bapcpas-2005-amendments/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On April 2, 2009, Representative Jerrold Nadler&#160;(D-NY) introduced a bill entitled the &#34;Business Reorganization and &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On April 2, 2009, Representative Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) introduced a bill entitled the "Business Reorganization and Job Protection Act of 2009." The bill has been co-sponsored by Representative Steve Cohen (D-TN), the Chairman of the Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law of the United States House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary. As of the date of this post…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2009/04/articles/legislation-introduced-to-repeal-certain-business-bankruptcy-changes-made-by-bapcpas-2005-amendments/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Terrible Twos? A Look At BAPCPA&#8217;s Impact On Business Bankruptcy Cases At Its Second Anniversary</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2007/10/articles/the-terrible-twos-a-look-at-bapcpas-impact-on-business-bankruptcy-cases-at-its-second-anniversary/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 04:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administrative claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAPCPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reclamation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthered.wp.lexblogs.com/2007/10/the-terrible-twos-a-look-at-bapcpas-impact-on-business-bankruptcy-cases-at-its-second-anniversary/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Tomorrow,&#160;October 17, 2007, marks the second anniversary of the effective date of the Bankruptcy Abuse &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tomorrow, October 17, 2007, marks the second anniversary of the effective date of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005, known as BAPCPA. BAPCPA was enacted primarily to make sweeping changes to the consumer provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. However, BAPCPA also made significant revisions in the business bankruptcy arena. When it was passed, bankruptcy lawyers…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2007/10/articles/the-terrible-twos-a-look-at-bapcpas-impact-on-business-bankruptcy-cases-at-its-second-anniversary/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Best Of Both Worlds: Can A Secured Creditor Get A Section 503(b)(9) &#8220;20 Day Goods&#8221; Administrative Claim Too?</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2007/09/articles/the-best-of-both-worlds-can-a-secured-creditor-get-a-section-503b9-20-day-goods-administrative-claim-too/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 03:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Financially Troubled Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administrative claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAPCPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reclamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[setoff]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthered.wp.lexblogs.com/2007/09/the-best-of-both-worlds-can-a-secured-creditor-get-a-section-503b9-20-day-goods-administrative-claim-too/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In a decision from August 17, 2007,&#160;just released for publication, the Ninth Circuit&#8217;s Bankruptcy Appellate &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a decision from August 17, 2007, just released for publication, the Ninth Circuit’s Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) faced a previously unanswered question under Section 503(b)(9) of the Bankruptcy Code, the section enacted as part of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (known as BAPCPA). Is a Section 503(b)(9) administrative claim available to secured creditors…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2007/09/articles/the-best-of-both-worlds-can-a-secured-creditor-get-a-section-503b9-20-day-goods-administrative-claim-too/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Important New Ruling, New York Bankruptcy Court Applies Prior Lien Defense To Post-BAPCPA Reclamation Claims</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2007/04/articles/in-important-new-ruling-new-york-bankruptcy-court-applies-prior-lien-defense-to-post-bapcpa-reclamation-claims/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 03:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administrative claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAPCPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reclamation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthered.wp.lexblogs.com/2007/04/in-important-new-ruling-new-york-bankruptcy-court-applies-prior-lien-defense-to-post-bapcpa-reclamation-claims/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On Thursday, April 19, 2007, in perhaps only the second decision on reclamation since the &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Thursday, April 19, 2007, in perhaps only the second decision on reclamation since the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (BAPCPA) took effect in October 2005, Judge Burton R. Lifland of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York issued this Memorandum Decision in the In re Dana Corporation Chapter 11 bankruptcy case. Employing an analysis similar to…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2007/04/articles/in-important-new-ruling-new-york-bankruptcy-court-applies-prior-lien-defense-to-post-bapcpa-reclamation-claims/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New Section 503(b)(9) Administrative Claim: The Latest On What Courts And Debtors Have Been Doing</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2007/02/articles/the-new-section-503b9-administrative-claim-the-latest-on-what-courts-and-debtors-have-been-doing/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 03:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Financially Troubled Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administrative claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAPCPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reclamation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthered.wp.lexblogs.com/2007/02/the-new-section-503b9-administrative-claim-the-latest-on-what-courts-and-debtors-have-been-doing/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A couple of months ago I posted on the new &#34;20 day goods&#34; administrative claim &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of months ago I posted on the new "20 day goods" administrative claim enacted as part of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 ("BAPCPA"). BAPCPA, which took effect in October 2005, added Section 503(b)(9) to the Bankruptcy Code giving vendors an administrative priority claim for "the value of any goods received by the debtor within 20 days before"</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2007/02/articles/the-new-section-503b9-administrative-claim-the-latest-on-what-courts-and-debtors-have-been-doing/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delaware Bankruptcy Court Denies Reclamation Claimant&#8217;s TRO Request To Stop Sale Of Goods</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2007/01/articles/delaware-bankruptcy-court-denies-reclamation-claimants-tro-request-to-stop-sale-of-goods/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 19:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administrative claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAPCPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reclamation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthered.wp.lexblogs.com/2007/01/delaware-bankruptcy-court-denies-reclamation-claimants-tro-request-to-stop-sale-of-goods/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In a recent post, I discussed how Section 546(c) of the Bankruptcy Code, as revised &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a recent post, I discussed how Section 546(c) of the Bankruptcy Code, as revised by the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 ("BAPCPA"), gives vendors the ability to assert a reclamation claim for goods received by a debtor in the 45 days prior to the bankruptcy filing. In addition to extending the reclamation period to 45 days, BAPCPA also added a provision in…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2007/01/articles/delaware-bankruptcy-court-denies-reclamation-claimants-tro-request-to-stop-sale-of-goods/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Bankruptcy Resource: The Absolute Priority Newsletter</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2006/12/articles/new-bankruptcy-resource-the-absolute-priority-newsletter/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 00:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administrative claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAPCPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reclamation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthered.wp.lexblogs.com/2006/12/new-bankruptcy-resource-the-absolute-priority-newsletter/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As a member of the Bankruptcy &#38; Restructuring Group at Cooley Godward Kronish LLP, I &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a member of the Bankruptcy & Restructuring Group at Cooley Godward Kronish LLP, I wanted to let you know that we have just launched a new quarterly newsletter called Absolute Priority. The newsletter give updates on current developments in bankruptcies and workouts with the goal of keeping you "ahead of the curve" on these issues. You can access a copy of the first edition here and can register…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2006/12/articles/new-bankruptcy-resource-the-absolute-priority-newsletter/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>20 Day Goods: New Administrative Claim For Goods Sold Just Before Bankruptcy</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2006/12/articles/20-day-goods-new-administrative-claim-for-goods-sold-just-before-bankruptcy/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 16:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Financially Troubled Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administrative claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAPCPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reclamation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthered.wp.lexblogs.com/2006/12/20-day-goods-new-administrative-claim-for-goods-sold-just-before-bankruptcy/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In a recent post about a vendor&#8217;s reclamation rights,&#160;I discussed how the 2005 amendments to &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a recent post about a vendor’s reclamation rights, I discussed how the 2005 amendments to the bankruptcy laws, known as the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (called "BAPCPA"), extended a vendor’s right to reclaim goods once a bankruptcy petition has been filed. This post focuses on another of BAPCPA’s important changes affecting vendors, specifically…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2006/12/articles/20-day-goods-new-administrative-claim-for-goods-sold-just-before-bankruptcy/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reclamation: Can A Vendor &#8220;Get The Goods&#8221; From An Insolvent Customer?</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2006/11/articles/reclamation-can-a-vendor-get-the-goods-from-an-insolvent-customer/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Financially Troubled Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administrative claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAPCPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insolvent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reclamation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthered.wp.lexblogs.com/2006/11/reclamation-can-a-vendor-get-the-goods-from-an-insolvent-customer/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Although vendors sell goods to get paid, it doesn&#8217;t always work out that way. If &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although vendors sell goods to get paid, it doesn’t always work out that way. If the customer is insolvent or files bankruptcy, the vendor may be stuck with an unpaid account. To make matters worse, some customers (especially those with limited prospects for financing) may even "load up" on inventory and then file bankruptcy without paying. Regardless of why it happens, no one wants to ship goods…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2006/11/articles/reclamation-can-a-vendor-get-the-goods-from-an-insolvent-customer/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
