<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>intellectual property</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/tag/intellectual-property/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com</link>
	<description>The Business Bankruptcy Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2026 04:27:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>ABI&#8217;s Industry Viewpoint Interview: Intellectual Property And Bankruptcy</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2022/07/articles/abis-industry-viewpoint-interview-intellectual-property-and-bankruptcy/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 14:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executory contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/?p=3967</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I recently had the honor of talking with the American Bankruptcy Institute&#8217;s Editor-at-Large Bill Rochelle &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently had the honor of talking with the American Bankruptcy Institute’s Editor-at-Large Bill Rochelle about the intersection of intellectual property and bankruptcy, as part of ABI’s Industry Viewpoints video series. Bill and I discussed issues ranging from the U.S. Supreme Court’s Tempnology decision involving trademark licenses, to Section 365(n) of the Bankruptcy Code…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2022/07/articles/abis-industry-viewpoint-interview-intellectual-property-and-bankruptcy/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Throwing Shade At Sunbeam: Following Lubrizol And Not The Seventh Circuit, The First Circuit Leaves Another Trademark Licensee Rejected And Out Of Luck</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2018/01/articles/throwing-shade-sunbeam-following-lubrizol-not-seventh-circuit-first-circuit-leaves-another-trademark-licensee-rejected-luck/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executory contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/?p=3257</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Tempnology Trademark Saga. When it comes to decisions on bankruptcy and trademark licenses, the In &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Tempnology Trademark Saga. When it comes to decisions on bankruptcy and trademark licenses, the In re Tempnology LLC bankruptcy case is the gift that keeps on giving. Before turning to the First Circuit’s decision, let’s set the stage with a brief review of the underlying facts, a few more highlights from the Bankruptcy Court’s original decision, and the BAP’s subsequent take on these…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2018/01/articles/throwing-shade-sunbeam-following-lubrizol-not-seventh-circuit-first-circuit-leaves-another-trademark-licensee-rejected-luck/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Did The ABI Chapter 11 Commission Recommend On Intellectual Property Licenses And Bankruptcy Issues?</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2014/12/articles/what-did-the-abi-chapter-11-commission-recommend-on-intellectual-property-licenses-and-bankruptcy-issues/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2014 16:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankruptcy.cooley.com/?p=2734</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The American Bankruptcy Institute&#8216;s Commission to Study the Reform of Chapter 11 issued its report last &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The American Bankruptcy Institute‘s Commission to Study the Reform of Chapter 11 issued its report last week, capping more than two years of hearings, meetings, and hard work. Having had the honor of testifying before the Commission on intellectual property and bankruptcy issues at one of its hearings in New York in June 2013, I wanted to take a closer look at its intellectual property…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2014/12/articles/what-did-the-abi-chapter-11-commission-recommend-on-intellectual-property-licenses-and-bankruptcy-issues/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Trend Of Protecting Trademark Licensees In Bankruptcy Continues: For The First Time A Court Extends Section 365(n) Protections To Trademark Licensees On Equitable Grounds</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2014/11/articles/the-trend-of-protecting-trademark-licensees-in-bankruptcy-continues-for-the-first-time-a-court-extends-section-365n-protections-to-trademark-licensees-on-equitable-grounds/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 06:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executory contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankruptcy.cooley.com/?p=2511</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If you doubted it before, you can stop now. The trend of courts finding ways &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you doubted it before, you can stop now. The trend of courts finding ways to protect trademark licensees from the harsh effects of losing their trademark license rights in bankruptcy is in full swing. The latest example comes in the Crumbs Bake Shop, Inc. Chapter 11 bankruptcy case in New Jersey. On October 31, 2014, Judge Michael B. Kaplan of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2014/11/articles/the-trend-of-protecting-trademark-licensees-in-bankruptcy-continues-for-the-first-time-a-court-extends-section-365n-protections-to-trademark-licensees-on-equitable-grounds/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Supreme Court Denies Review In Jaffe v. Samsung, Letting Stand The Fourth Circuit&#8217;s Decision Applying Section 365(n) To Protect Licensees In A Chapter 15 Bankruptcy Case</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2014/10/articles/u-s-supreme-court-denies-review-in-jaffe-v-samsung-letting-stand-the-fourth-circuits-decision-applying-section-365n-to-protect-licensees-in-a-chapter-15-cross-border-bankruptcy-case/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 18:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international insolvency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankruptcy.cooley.com/?p=2489</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On Monday, October 6, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an order denying the petition &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Monday, October 6, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an order denying the petition for a writ of certiorari in the Jaffe v. Samsung case, also known as the Qimonda case. The Supreme Court let stand the Fourth Circuit’s December 2013 decision that affirmed the bankruptcy court’s order applying Bankruptcy Code Section 365(n) in a Chapter 15 cross-border bankruptcy case. For a full discussion…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2014/10/articles/u-s-supreme-court-denies-review-in-jaffe-v-samsung-letting-stand-the-fourth-circuits-decision-applying-section-365n-to-protect-licensees-in-a-chapter-15-cross-border-bankruptcy-case/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Closer Look At Recent Trends At The Intersection Of Intellectual Property And Bankruptcy Law</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2014/09/articles/a-closer-look-at-recent-trends-at-the-intersection-of-intellectual-property-and-bankruptcy-law/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 14:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankruptcy.cooley.com/?p=2455</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I had the honor of being a panelist at the American Bankruptcy Institute&#8216;s 22nd Annual &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the honor of being a panelist at the American Bankruptcy Institute‘s 22nd Annual Southwest Bankruptcy Conference last Friday, speaking on current developments in business bankruptcy. My part of the discussion focused on recent intellectual property and bankruptcy law trends. Among the topics I covered were: For those who couldn’t attend the conference, you can follow the link in this…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2014/09/articles/a-closer-look-at-recent-trends-at-the-intersection-of-intellectual-property-and-bankruptcy-law/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent Reform Bill, And Its Revisions To Bankruptcy Code Section 365(n), Stalls In The Senate</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2014/05/articles/patent-reform-bill-and-its-revisions-to-bankruptcy-code-section-365n-stall-in-the-senate/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 17:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankruptcy.cooley.com/?p=2006</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Image courtesy of Matt H. Wade In December 2013 I wrote about the Innovation Act, &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Image courtesy of Matt H. Wade In December 2013 I wrote about the Innovation Act, H.R. 3309, a bill focused on patent infringement litigation and other patent law reforms that passed the House of Representatives on a bipartisan basis. My interest in the bill was because it would make the most sweeping changes to the treatment of intellectual property licenses in bankruptcy since the 1988…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2014/05/articles/patent-reform-bill-and-its-revisions-to-bankruptcy-code-section-365n-stall-in-the-senate/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Innovation Act, Passed By The House, Would Make Major Changes To Section 365(n)&#8217;s IP Licensee Protections</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2013/12/articles/innovation-act-passed-by-the-house-would-make-major-changes-to-section-365ns-ip-licensee-protections/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 12:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthered.wp.lexblogs.com/2013/12/innovation-act-passed-by-the-house-would-make-major-changes-to-section-365ns-ip-licensee-protections/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It isn&#8217;t law yet, but on December 5, 2013, the U.S. House of Representatives passed &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It isn’t law yet, but on December 5, 2013, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a significant patent reform bill known as the "Innovation Act." Although the focus of the legislation is on patent infringement litigation and other patent law revisions, the Innovation Act, H.R. 3309, would also make major changes to Section 365(n) of the Bankruptcy Code. Follow the link in the prior sentence for…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2013/12/articles/innovation-act-passed-by-the-house-would-make-major-changes-to-section-365ns-ip-licensee-protections/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Worlds Collide, The Sequel: Fourth Circuit Rules On Section 365(n)&#8217;s IP Licensee Protections In Chapter 15 Cross-Border Bankruptcy</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2013/12/articles/when-worlds-collide-the-sequel-fourth-circuit-rules-on-section-365ns-ip-licensee-protections-in-chapter-15-cross-border-bankruptcy/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2013 14:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international insolvency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthered.wp.lexblogs.com/2013/12/when-worlds-collide-the-sequel-fourth-circuit-rules-on-section-365ns-ip-licensee-protections-in-chapter-15-cross-border-bankruptcy/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My how time flies in protracted bankruptcy litigation. More than four years ago, as I reported back at &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My how time flies in protracted bankruptcy litigation. More than four years ago, as I reported back at the time, the Bankruptcy Court in the Chapter 15 cross-border bankruptcy case of Qimonda AG issued its first decision on the application of Section 365(n) in that case. After an initial appeal, a four-day trial on remand, and another appeal, last week the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2013/12/articles/when-worlds-collide-the-sequel-fourth-circuit-rules-on-section-365ns-ip-licensee-protections-in-chapter-15-cross-border-bankruptcy/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video Of Testimony Before ABI Commission To Study Reform Of Chapter 11</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2013/06/articles/video-of-testimony-before-abi-commission-to-study-reform-of-chapter-11/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 13:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthered.wp.lexblogs.com/2013/06/video-of-testimony-before-abi-commission-to-study-reform-of-chapter-11/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As mentioned in a recent blog post, the American Bankruptcy Institute has established a Commission &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As mentioned in a recent blog post, the American Bankruptcy Institute has established a Commission to Study the Reform of Chapter 11. A video of testimony before the Commission’s June 4, 2013 field hearing in New York is available below. More information on the Commission and its work, together with access to the video and written testimony of all panelists at the Commission’s hearings…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2013/06/articles/video-of-testimony-before-abi-commission-to-study-reform-of-chapter-11/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
