<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>asset</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/tag/asset/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com</link>
	<description>The Business Bankruptcy Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:36:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Decision Settles The Section 1146(a) Transfer Tax Exemption Issue</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2008/06/articles/supreme-court-decision-settles-the-section-1146a-transfer-tax-exemption-issue/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asset purchase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plan of reorganization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthered.wp.lexblogs.com/2008/06/supreme-court-decision-settles-the-section-1146a-transfer-tax-exemption-issue/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On June 16, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in&#160;Florida Dept. of &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On June 16, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Florida Dept. of Revenue v. Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc., the case involving whether Section 1146(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, which exempts from stamp or similar taxes any asset transfer “under a plan confirmed under section 1129 of the Code,” applies to transfers of assets occurring prior to the actual confirmation of such a…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2008/06/articles/supreme-court-decision-settles-the-section-1146a-transfer-tax-exemption-issue/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Happened At The Supreme Court Oral Argument In The Section 1146(a) Bankruptcy Transfer Tax Exemption Case?</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2008/03/articles/what-happened-at-the-supreme-court-oral-argument-in-the-section-1146a-bankruptcy-transfer-tax-exemption-case/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 03:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asset purchase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthered.wp.lexblogs.com/2008/03/what-happened-at-the-supreme-court-oral-argument-in-the-section-1146a-bankruptcy-transfer-tax-exemption-case/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On Wednesday, March 26, 2008, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in the &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday, March 26, 2008, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of Florida Dept. of Revenue v. Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc. A link to the transcript of the oral argument can be found below. The case presents the following question: With so many asset transfers in Chapter 11 cases taking place through Section 363 asset sales before plan confirmation…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2008/03/articles/what-happened-at-the-supreme-court-oral-argument-in-the-section-1146a-bankruptcy-transfer-tax-exemption-case/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delaware Bankruptcy Court Adopts New Local Rule For Section 363 Sales</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2008/02/articles/delaware-bankruptcy-court-adopts-new-local-rule-for-section-363-sales/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 04:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asset purchase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executory contract]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthered.wp.lexblogs.com/2008/02/delaware-bankruptcy-court-adopts-new-local-rule-for-section-363-sales/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Delaware Bankruptcy Court has recently adopted amended Local Rules, which became effective on February &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Delaware Bankruptcy Court has recently adopted amended Local Rules, which became effective on February 1, 2008, and they include meaningful changes to the procedures governing Section 363 sales of assets. New Local Rule 6004-1, entitled "Sale and Sale Procedures Motions," requires additional disclosure and the highlighting of certain key provisions often seen in sale motions.</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2008/02/articles/delaware-bankruptcy-court-adopts-new-local-rule-for-section-363-sales/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Miss The Important Business Bankruptcy Rule Amendments That Just Took Effect</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2007/12/articles/dont-miss-the-important-business-bankruptcy-rule-amendments-that-just-took-effect/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 04:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asset purchase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executory contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proof of claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthered.wp.lexblogs.com/2007/12/dont-miss-the-important-business-bankruptcy-rule-amendments-that-just-took-effect/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On December 1st of almost every year, amendments to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On December 1st of almost every year, amendments to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure — the ones that govern how bankruptcy cases are managed — take effect to address issues identified by an Advisory Committee made up of federal judges, bankruptcy attorneys, and others. Often the changes are relatively minor and of interest only to bankruptcy practitioners, but this year’s set has made…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2007/12/articles/dont-miss-the-important-business-bankruptcy-rule-amendments-that-just-took-effect/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Have Section 363 Sale Orders Gone Too Far?</title>
		<link>https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2007/08/articles/have-section-363-sale-orders-gone-too-far/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 21:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Bankruptcy Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asset purchase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[purchase]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthered.wp.lexblogs.com/2007/08/have-section-363-sale-orders-gone-too-far/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Concerned about the broad-reaching and complex forms of Section 363 asset orders being submitted for &#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concerned about the broad-reaching and complex forms of Section 363 asset orders being submitted for approval, this past week the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California issued a set of "Guidelines re Sale Orders" as well as a form of "Model Sale Order." (Each document is available by clicking on its respective title in the prior sentence.) The Bankruptcy Court’s opening…</p>
<p><a href="https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2007/08/articles/have-section-363-sale-orders-gone-too-far/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
